Monthly Archives: May 2016

A Practical Approach To Service Portfolio Management

A Practical Approach to Service Portfolio Management
CA World 2010
Abstract
Are you still attempting to make improvements in a piece meal fashion because you don’ t think you have the time or the resources to take on something that has the transformational? Attend this session and see how three key best-practice frameworks can be integrated in a practical manner so that you can govern investments across your enterprise and manage them to maximum value.
Project Portfolio Management, IT Service Management and IT Asset Management Lifecycle (ITAM) frameworks exist to provide cost efficiency, improve service delivery and to help you to achieve your organizational goals. Each of these frameworks can improve processes and productivity independently, but when elements are combined they are able to deliver exponentially more value. Presenters will discuss how to align engagement between IT and the business at key points such as corporate planning, request management and resource management, how to simultaneously drive cost efficiency while improving service, all while utilizing an approach that delivers value in 3 to 6 months.
Biography
Paul L. Wheaton, Portfolio Director
Acquity Group, Business and Technology Enablement Practice

Mr. Wheaton has 20 years of experience within the technology industry, including experience managing large professional services practices as well as global business development practices for both professional services firms and software-focused solutions. Prior to joining Acquity Group, Mr. Wheaton served in a variety of managerial roles within Andersen Consulting’ s, BDM Technologies’ and Deloitte &Touche LLP’ s strategic services consulting practices, as well as executive management roles at Platinum Technology, CA (formerly known as Computer Associates) and Five9 Technologies.

Agenda
Objectives for this session
Background and working definitions
Limitations of taking the usual silo’ d approach
Practical way to get started
Questions and Answers
Session Objectives
To describe the most common best practice frameworks (i.e., ITIL, IT Asset Management and Project Portfolio Management) and the value that can be gained by each
To discuss the limitations of implementing these frameworks in an independent fashion
To describe an incremental method to align engagement between IT and the business at key points such as corporate planning, demand management, resource management, etc.
Today’ s Business Environment is Demanding
How often do you hear?
What does it mean to manage for business value?
It means that you :
Understand how high-value business services are defined and measured
Align IT services and resources to core business services
Measure those IT services -both from quality of service and cost perspectives -in comparable manners to the business service
Communicate cost and performance regularly with business counterparts, using business terms that they understand

Challenges often faced:
Difficult to understand demand when it’ s neither visible nor aligned
Multiple ways to request IT services
Not all demand is captured, or at least captured in a consistent fashion
Demand for IT services unlikely to be correlated to accompanying business service
Information related to cost, quality, and business purpose is often:
Fragmented across the enterprise
Partially complete
Even if the legacy systems and/or processes contained the data, it’ s unlikely that it’ s organized in terms that your business counterparts understand

So what do people usually try?
Service Operation and Transition as a starting point
ITAM helps, too
ITAM manages the financial aspects of IT assets which:
Provides the ability to manage contracts, including software license compliance. hardware maintenance contracts and 3rd party vendor contracts
Enables IT to understand where IT Assets are located, the status of that Asset and how they are being utilized over time
Controls and can enable the reduction of asset shrinkage
Enables the mitigation and reduction of Regulatory and Financial Risk through standardization, proper documentation, loss detection

ITAM helps, too
PPM is crucial
Project Portfolio Management is a continuous process by which:
Management prioritizes demand
Plans and allocates resources to preferred investment initiatives
Manages portfolio governance-orientated collaboration with stakeholders
Delivers expected results from the investment
Provides reporting to stakeholders for decision-making and the communication of investment status

PPM is crucial but has its limits
It really needs to fit together in a broader context
ITIL v3 Service Portfolio Definition
The complete set of Services that are managed by a Service Provider. The Service Portfolio is used to manage the entire Lifecycle of all Services
The Service Portfolio includes three Categories:
Service Pipeline (proposed or in Development)
Service Catalogue (Live or available for Deployment) and
Retired Services
So what is Service Portfolio Management?
Gartner defines IT Service Portfolio Management as:
Documenting the service portfolio of standardized IT services
Decomposing those service “offerings” into an actionable¬†service catalog of specific service request items including pricing and service level objectives
Automating the fulfillment of service requests and approvals
Reporting on service request actuals vs. forecasts, service delivery, service level performance and service financial management
Service Portfolio as a Context for Communication
So what does this start to look like?
Our context revisited
How do you look at Business Value?
Examining Services from a Value Perspective
Business and IT Services
So what does this offer?
This approach allows you to:
Manage the related cost and performance detail in business value context
Communicate back to the business with terms that they understand
Align investment decisions directly to business contributions

Itil And It Service Management Specialist Leader Deloitte Consulting

Cloud computing: Is ITIL still relevant?
Randy Steinberg
ITIL and IT Service Management Specialist Leader, Deloitte Consulting
Nicholas Clarke Senior Consultant, Deloitte Consulting
Table of contents

A capability to abstract this value chain in the form of services is critical to the future success of IT and its mission of delivering business value
ITIL can be seen as supporting the Service Management layer within the HP Cloud Assure architecture, where its processes cover the entire value chain
HP Cloud Assure Reference Architecture

The current set of HP IT Service Management Tools can support your cloud services program when looking at either vendor, internal or hybrid solutions
Two cloud computing case studies demonstrate the sharp difference between using a service management approach versus not

Cloud computing will not change the strategic objectives or the market spaces of a service, it provides new avenues to reach those objectives
The nature of cloud computing may require changes in how services are charged, and how IT organizations allocate cloud services costs
Cloud computing forces IT to take a hard look at the services they deliver, and how these are bundled to add value for varying stakeholders

Design the cloud computing solution to provide maximum benefits to business instead of treating it solely as technology innovation
Service catalog management, service level management, and capacity management processes are necessary to achieve an integrated Cloud computing solution to complement business needs

Cloud computing requires a renewed effort in supplier management processes to ensure meeting terms, conditions, and target of agreements

Transition planning and support processes plan and coordinate resources to deploy a cloud service within predicted cost, time, and quality estimates
Coordination between IT and cloud vendors is critical to ensure that beneficial changes can be made minimum disruption to IT services
Cloud vendors need to be integrated with release/deployment processes to protect the integrity of the live environment when releasing components

Monitoring for security compliance, privacy and access, reliability, and availability of IT services and components pose increased challenges
Sharing the high number of nodes in vendor clouds sees failed configuration components as the norm rather than the exception
As you refine your and integrate cloud delivery with your overall service management capability, look to improve operations through automation

The melding of cloud centric approaches with CSI by IT can dramatically speed up realignment and improvement processes
The nature of cloud computing may lead to challenges for CSI such as misalignment between business needs and technical solution

Q&A

To learn more on this topic, and to connect with your peers after the conference, visit the HP Software Solutions Community:

Pc Software Metering

2013 ITSD All Staff Meeting

—- Presentations —-
Process Trend line metrics
ITSM Tool Selection and Migration Project

Nov 15th 2013
ITSM Process Trendline Metrics
Incident –
Request –
Change –
What these are and how they are used
Incident -Resolved on First Contact
Incident -Volume Trendline
Drillable by
Section
State
Priority

Request -Volume Trendline
Change Trendline
Watched Trends
Successful Changes

ITSM Support Tool Selection and Migration
Aka òKBOX Replacement’
Project 29391

TEAM: Andy Jackson, bill Conant, Carmela Ho, Sharon Okada, Thatcher Deane
PM: Thatcher & Sharon

Who
Outline
Background -Thatcher
Goals -Sharon
Selection -Thatcher
Migration -Bill
How will the new tool be different -Carmela
Related efforts and Projects -Thatcher
What you can do to help -Thatcher & Team
Background (1/2)
HelpDesk IT Service Support Management Tool
In the beginning
— nothing, at least not anything Jacob remembers
1997?- Apr 2008 HEAT v8.4
Apr 2008 -Feb 2012 KBOX (OOTB) v4.x v5.1
Feb 2012 -May 2014 KBOX (ITSM processes) v5.2
MPD 2002? -Aug 2012 Track-It
May 2014 -Dec 7, 2019 HEAT Cloud 2013
Background (2/2)
You Know it is time to upgrade your ticket system when:
Everyone hates the current tool
A Gartner Assessment says you need to do it to mature your Service Management
You’ d done all you can to cockroach/MacGyver ITSM support out of your current tool
You want to do a better job
You want better help to do your job
Its time to have a new tool to hate

Goals (1/2)
Easier than KBOX
Finding stuff
Doing routine tasks
Better current ITSM process support
Integrated (this was part of the problem with the Problem process)
Actionable Service Management Reports and Metrics
Supports next ITSM steps
(Better) Service Catalog and Portfolio Management
Modeled (template) Requests
Configuration Management
Knowledge Management
Customer Portal
Event Management
Goals (2/2)
New Tool will not replace KBOX for these services:
Windows desktop Patching
Scripting for PC pushes and tweeks
PC auto-discovery to be linked to new tool
PC software metering
Any deployment support from the K2000

Selection (1/2)
High level Criteria
Better than KBOX
ITSM Process support
Appropriate to us
Has both cloud and on premise installs and ability to switch
To speed acquisition (subscription)
Future in-house option
Lookup into old KBOX tickets
Link to KBOX PC autodiscovery information
Support Configuration Management process
Support Customer Portal / Self Service
Candidates
Cherwell Service Manager
Easy Vista
HEAT Cloud 2013

Selection (2/2)
Selection Process
Product demos
Trial environments
Study & testing
Product Comparison
Team vote
The winner: Heat Cloud 2013
Besides meeting the requirements
Ease of first use, navigation
Less transition effort for IT Staff users
Best support for multiple ITSM Roles

Migration Strategy
Implementation assistance from the vendor
Do not adjust or rework existing processes
Keep as simple and open as possible
Position for later enhancements
Consolidate tool admin and ITSM process development
Link, do not migrate, closed tickets

Migration Tactical
Project Wiki in the DMZ for vendor access
All remote vendor engagement
Obtain staff input via Project Team
Staff training
Open ticket migration TBD
. to be developed by the project team

How will new tool be different? (1/2)
Remaining the same:
Process flows and descriptions for Incident, Request, Change, and Problem
No process redesigns at this time
List views of tickets
Web based
ITIL terms and concept
Keep current ticket status values (as much as possible)
Can open multiple tickets in one screen

How will new tool be different? (2/2)
Different from KBOX:
Only as required to get the features we need
More useful information on the screens
Views and permissions based on Roles
òService Request’ instead of just òRequest’
Ticket numbers are not unique across Incident, Service Request, Change etc.
Ticket templates
Some screen shots

KBOX 5.2
HEAT Cloud 2013.2
HEAT Cloud 2013.2
Related efforts and Projects
Interim Configuration Management Project (Mary W. and Thatcher D.)
Organization -Location -Employee information linkage
County Wide VoIP Project (Bill Conant & Annie J.)
Source for best location and phone information
HIJIS Federated Identity Management (Jacob V & state resources)
SAMLv2 Protocol for invisible/seamless login to HEAT Cloud
Business Continuity Planning (Mary W.)
Major customer of many of the same data as HEAT Cloud
MPD CAD Upgrade Project (Susan U and a cast of thousands)
Resource and scheduling impact

What you can do to help
Support your representative on the team
When you have questions about this project
When they need your input
Close open stale tickets
Review the wiki
Be patient
Be available for training
Add more days to the calendar

References (1/2)
HEAT Cloud 2013 online help (also a useful introduction to the tool).
support.frontrange.com/common/files/support/heat_cloud/user/index.html
HEAT Cloud 2013 webinar demos:
Highlevel/glitzy support.frontrange.com/common/Files/Downloads/ProductDemos/SaaS/SaaSDemo/SaaSDemo.html

CoM demo with focus on core features and use frontrange.webex.com/frontrange/ldr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21102762&rKey=3ed3ef6caf39d4e2
CoM demo with focus on configuration frontrange.webex.com/frontrange/ldr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=21577437&rKey=b0571ee9053d8cc2
ITSM Program (Matrix) Page
intranet.co.maui.hi.us/index.aspx?nid=737

References (2/2)
Project Wiki – 172.22.30.220/wikiitsm

Questions
As many as we can fit, but not all will.

So See your Section Rep on the Project Team or the PMs for more.

Revision History (1/3)
01 -Initial Draft Prepared for 11/1 team meeting
02 -Revisions based on idea of team presenting portions of presentation and my usual detail adding
03 -Carmela detailed input, more graphics etc.
To High Level Criteria added Support Configuration Management process
Revised background slide by Date
Added some Notes text for various slides. Not so much for the presenters, as for those who cannot be at the presentation or want to revisit later (including the Team!)
Added Service Catalog and Portfolio Management to ònext steps

Revision History (2/3)
03 (continued)
Added usual animation for pacing
04 Before and during 11/8 Team review:
Added July 16th demo for Sharon to References
05 After 11/8 Team meeting:
Added KOBX HEAT screen prints
To Selection added:
Appropriate to our size and organizational maturity
06 To adjust for printed vs displayed
Tacked on Metrics graphs in front
Also an opening slide.
Switched to blank design to save printer toner.

Revision History (3/3)
07 Reversed the BW to color
Removed specificity about migration method.
08 – 09 Minor Post Printing and Presentation changes mostly for clarity.

Software Licenses

Computing Division Helpdesk Activity Report
Rick Thies/Jack Schmidt
July 31, 2007
Agenda
Services
Support
Gratuitous Remedy Metrics
OSG Update
Recent Projects
New Projects

Helpdesk Services
24 x 7 User support
Cryptocards
DOE Grid Certificate services
Email
Quota
Forwards
Passwords
Hardware service
Triage service requests with internal/external vendors
Create, track vendor service request

Helpdesk Services
Pager schedules
Software Licenses
Software distribution
Dongles
Tier1 Desktop triage
Software Installs
Troubleshooting
User Accounts
Creation
Passwords
UID/GID
Client Verification/Validation
Helpdesk Support
Pre-reorg
Helpdesk
Rick Thies -GL
Jere Bozonelos
Tom Bozonelos
Yolanda Valadez
Development
Linda Blomberg
Marc Mengel*
Rich Thompson

After Reorg
Helpdesk
Jack Schmidt -GL
Rick Thies -Asst. GL
Linda Blomberg
Jere Bozonelos
Tom Bozonelos
Brandon Minor (SS)
Yolanda Valadez
Development
Linda Blomberg*
Marc Mengel*
Off Hours Metrics
Remedy Metrics 2007
Remedy Metrics 2007 (Category)
Remedy Metrics 2007 (Source)
Remedy Metrics 2007 (Group)
DOE Grid Certificate Approvals 2007

OSG Support Center Update
MOU written between FNAL and IU -Needs formal approval:
CD-doc-2004
Notification of changes and test plans
Notification of system outages
Ticket Metrics
Trackable metrics from IU FNAL
Automation of tickets to CMS exists, implementing same for CDF,D0, DES, FERMIGRID, ILC, LQCD, and SDSS

Remedy/Footprints Metrics

Recent Projects
Re-org
Adding new groups and pager schedules to Remedy
Defining system and service support*
Sync NGOP systems and Remedy
FCIRT
Build response and tracking workflow for incidents
Ticket Rollover
Modify Remedy to handle 6 digit ticket numbers
Time change
Helpful advice on system configuration
Integration/Production Systems in Sync

New Projects
Helpdesk Assessment
Server Hardware Changes
Off Hours Support Review
Phone Switch Review
Task Automation
Software Licensing
Helpdesk Assessment
Helpdesk process and technologies assessment by Logicalis
Items to be addressed (taken from SOW):
Validate the Fermi functional requirements with stakeholder groups for Helpdesk
Validate the data workflows and respective integrity in the process
Identify gaps in current/desired process
Gain consensus with stakeholder group representatives on strategy to move forward
Provide definition of recommended functionality additions
Develop detailed overall project plan to move forward to Definition/Design and Implementation stage

Helpdesk Assessment
Deliverables
List of quick wins that can be implemented rapidly and provide positive visible results for the Helpdesk
IT Help Desk Assessment Results & Recommendations Document
IT Help Desk Assessment Results & Recommendations Presentation
15 custom interviews with Project stakeholders (duration: 1 hour each)
Working on list
Helpdesk Assessment
Assessment based on Best Practices IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) and involves the Service Management Processes (ITSM).
ANL, LANL, LLNL and SNL presently using ITIL framework at some level

Server Hardware
Replacing outdated hardware
Moving to virtual machine model to reduce number of physical systems
New configuration based on Remedy best practices

Off Hours Support Review
Issues forced change in service (Sept 06):
Tel*Assist takes calls and routes info to Helpdesk Primary.
Helpdesk Primary: Contacts Client; Determines action; Takes action (normally creating ticket)
Helpdesk staff direct involvement takes less time and improves routing of issues*
Define Requirements (& Budget)

Phone Switch Review
Existing Issues
Runs unsupported OS.
Many features never implemented
Identifying Requirements and future needs
LHC @ FNAL Center interest

Task Automation
Remedy
Pager schedule entries
Open ticket website (replace Monday reminders)
Reduce cutting/pasting of ticket information
Accounts
Validating individuals
Verifying and entering Database information and forms to complete new accounts
Databases & forms accessed & updated for accounts CNAS, UserDB, Crypto Card Excel spreadsheet, CMS special principle, etc.
Password resets

Task Automation
Hardware Service
Additional time used when Misjob data is not up to date
Waiting on task numbers, location, serial numbers, etc.
Checking system warranties
Software License
Identify tasks for Helpdesk staff vs. License folk
Questions?
Contact the CD Helpdesk at ext. 2345 or helpdesk.fnal.gov

Purpose

Purpose
Information Technology Service Management [T009] Buyer’s Guide
?This guide provides summarized information for the buyer of active, enterprise contract products and services. By clicking on quick links — underlined, blue-colored words or sentences — one is redirected to various documents; such as, the awarded contract, the Invitation to Bid (ITB), guides and brochures that will assist in building a purchase order for the products and services on the specific contract, and in some guides allow direct access to the e-mail addresses or Web sites of vendor contacts.
Description
The purpose of this Invitation to Bid (ITB) of the State of Alabama, herein referred to as State or STATE, is to establish enterprise contracts to be used by State agencies, political subdivisions, local government agencies, and public educational institutions to purchase ServiceNow® Information Technology Services Management (ITSM) System Software Products and Technical Services. The State may use this contract to purchase ITSM related software or services included in this contract. The goal is to provide a catalog of Vendor provided ITSM products and services to accommodate an agency’s software-as-a-service (SaaS) requirements.
The terms VENDOR, BIDDER, or Vendor were used interchangeably within the ITB and refer to the entity submitting a response to the ITB or awarded the contract. The term manufacturer refers to the software publisher or manufacturer of software licensed under the software publisher’s brand name.
The awarded software Vendor provides ITSM system software as a service. The software offered by the Vendor must be outlined in a Software/Application Catalog.
The awarded technical services Vendor provides services not limited to, but may include ITSM architecture, design, integration, customization, software development and related training. The services provided by the Vendor must be outlined in a Services Catalog.
Both the ITSM Software and Services Catalogs must encompass the products offered by the VENDOR for SericeNow® ITSM System Software. The bid provided for the award of one software contract that included the full software application catalog and up to three services contracts. Vendors were allowed to bid on either or both the software and the services. Vendors were required to indicate which component they were bidding by completing and submitting the appropriate sections of Attachment A and Attachment B of the ITB.
The software was bid as a percentage discount from the manufacturer’s ITSM software catalog. The services were bid using the percentage discount off the catalog containing hourly rates for services. The discount bid applies to the entire catalog(s). The categories were evaluated and awarded separately. All Vendors were required to designate or declare whether the percent off catalog referred to the manufacturer suggested retail price (MSRP) or Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) price listing.
Use of Contract
To acquire software or services from this contract, please contact directly your Customer Service Manager or the ISD Help Desk with the Department of Finance, ISD.
Contract Notice of Award
Link to Contract
????Award Date
??????Duration
????Estimated Re-bid Year
??10/23/2014
??????5 years
??????2020
?????????????BG_T009 v.1.1 Page 1 of 2 1/14/2015 2:31 PM
Original ITB
Link to ITB
Information Technology Service Management [T009] Buyer’s Guide
??Product Guide & How to Order
Use the Product Guide to obtain the summarized contract information such as; company names, catalog links, discount rates, product descriptions, and contact information. If applicable and if available, link to the vendor’s website to review the product line and determine all specifications for the product or service that you wish to purchase. If the website offers capabilities such as; product comparisons and fill-a-cart or creation of a basket for purchasing, then take advantage of those features. Finally, complete a purchase order for one item and print the completed purchase order to use as a worksheet. You cannot purchase the product from the vendor’s site, but the worksheet will assist with your State purchasing request.
For this particular contract review Use of Contract instructions above. Employee Discount
Not applicable for this contract.
Vendor Brochure
Links or complete brochures will be provided when available from the vendor.
??????BG_T009 v.1.1 Page 2 of 2 1/14/2015 2:31 PM